Bitcoin-only wallets drop altcoin support to keep the code and attack surface small. Below are the hardware and software wallets our curated data lists as Bitcoin-only, each scored with equal weights (coin count is the same for all, so it doesn't separate them).
Run your own comparison →Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
| Fact | Coldcard | Coldcard Q |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | not found | not found |
| Supported coins | 1+ Bitcoin-only src · 2026-10-10 | 1+ Bitcoin-only src · 2026-10-10 |
| Security incidents | none in curated data (not proof of none) | none in curated data (not proof of none) |
| Open source | not found | not found |
Weights: Price 17%, Security 17%, Supported coins 17%, Ease of use 17%, Support 17%, Backup/recovery 17%
VaultRubric pick: Coldcard
| Criterion (weight) | Coldcard | Coldcard Q |
|---|---|---|
| Price (17%) | 10.0/10 | 6.9/10 |
| Security (17%) | not found | not found |
| Supported coins (17%) | 10.0/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Ease of use (17%) | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Support (17%) | not found | 4.0/10 |
| Backup/recovery (17%) | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Overall | 82.5% coverage 67% | 69.8% coverage 83% |
0.167×10.0 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 5.50; ÷ covered weight 0.667 = 8.25/10 → 82.5%0.167×6.9 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×4.0 + 0.167×8.0 = 5.82; ÷ covered weight 0.833 = 6.98/10 → 69.8%| Fact | Electrum | Sparrow | BlueWallet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | not found | not found | not found |
| Supported coins | 1+ Bitcoin only src · 2026-10-10 | 1+ Bitcoin only src · 2026-10-10 | 1+ Bitcoin + Lightning src · 2026-10-10 |
| Security incidents | none in curated data (not proof of none) | none in curated data (not proof of none) | none in curated data (not proof of none) |
| Open source | not found | not found | not found |
VaultRubric pick: Sparrow
| Criterion (weight) | Sparrow | Electrum | BlueWallet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (17%) | not found | 10/10 | not found |
| Security (17%) | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Supported coins (17%) | 10.0/10 | 10.0/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Ease of use (17%) | 6.0/10 | 6.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Support (17%) | 7.5/10 | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Backup/recovery (17%) | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Overall | 74.0% coverage 83% | 70.8% coverage 100% | 69.0% coverage 83% |
0.167×6.5 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×7.5 + 0.167×7.0 = 6.17; ÷ covered weight 0.833 = 7.40/10 → 74.0%0.167×10 + 0.167×6.5 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 7.08; ÷ covered weight 1.000 = 7.08/10 → 70.8%0.167×6.5 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 5.75; ÷ covered weight 0.833 = 6.90/10 → 69.0%Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
On this rubric, Coldcard scored highest. Your answer depends on your priorities; adjust the weights in the tool.
Each criterion gets 0–10 from cited evidence (curated dated data, live independent reviews, and AI analysis that must quote its source verbatim). Weights are normalized to 100%; missing data is excluded and shown as coverage. Platforms with an unreimbursed customer-funds hack in the last 48 months are capped at 60% and can't be the pick. Criminal guilty pleas (−2) and major civil settlements (−1) in the last 5 years reduce the security score.