VaultRubric
Binance vs OKX
Pick your crypto platform by the evidence.
Binance and OKX are both popular crypto exchanges. Below: the sourced facts side by side, then VaultRubric's equal-weight score with the math shown, so you can see exactly why one comes out ahead. Every number links to its source and date; anything we couldn't verify says not found.
Run your own comparison →Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
Key facts compared
| Fact | Binance | OKX |
|---|---|---|
| Trading fees (entry tier) | 0.1% maker / 0.1% taker Spot, Regular user; 0.075% when paying fees in BNB src · 2026-10-10 | 0.08% maker / 0.1% taker Spot Group 1, Regular user src · 2026-10-10 |
| Supported coins | 350+ src · 2026-10-10 | 320+ src · 2026-10-10 |
| Security incidents | 2019-05 7,000 BTC (~$40M) hot-wallet breach; covered src · 2026-10-10 | none in curated data (not proof of none) |
| Regulatory / legal actions | 2023-11 Pleaded guilty to BSA/AML, unlicensed money transmitting and sanctions (IEEPA) violations; $4.3B penalties; founder CZ pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 4 months src · 2026-10-10 | 2025-02 Pleaded guilty to operating an unlicensed money transmitting business serving US users; ~$505M ($84M fine + $420M forfeiture) src · 2026-10-10 src · 2026-10-10 |
| Proof of reserves | Yes src · 2026-10-10 | Yes src · 2026-10-10 |
| US availability | No Global exchange does not serve US; US users use separate Binance.US src · 2026-10-10 | No Global OKX not available in the US (only OKX US entity) src · 2026-10-10 |
| Licensing / regulation | not found | not found |
VaultRubric verdict
VaultRubric pick: OKX
⚠ OKX: Regulatory: Pleaded guilty to operating an unlicensed money transmitting business serving US users; ~$505M ($84M fine + $420M forfeiture) (2025-02)
⚠ Binance: customer funds loss >48 months ago (2019-05)
⚠ Binance: Regulatory: Pleaded guilty to BSA/AML, unlicensed money transmitting and sanctions (IEEPA) violations; $4.3B penalties; founder CZ pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 4 months (2023-11)
| Criterion (weight) | OKX | Binance |
|---|---|---|
| Fees (17%) | 10.0/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Security & track record (17%) | 6.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| Supported coins (17%) | 9.8/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Ease of use (17%) | 6.0/10 | 4.0/10 |
| Customer support (17%) | 3.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| US availability/regulation (17%) | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Overall | 58.0% coverage 100% | 48.3% coverage 100% |
Show math: OKX
0.167×10.0 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×9.8 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×0.0 = 5.80; ÷ covered weight 1.000 = 5.80/10 → 58.0%Show math: Binance
0.167×10.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×4.0 + 0.167×2.0 + 0.167×0.0 = 4.83; ÷ covered weight 1.000 = 4.83/10 → 48.3%Pros and cons
From independent reviews; each point links to its source.
OKX
Pros
- Low competitive fees src
- Strong security with cold storage and proof of reserves src
- Wide range of advanced trading options and products src
- Mobile app with clean interface and advanced charting src
Cons
Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
Related comparisons
- Binance vs Bybit
- OKX vs Bybit
- KuCoin vs Binance
- Coinbase vs Kraken
- Coinbase vs Gemini
- Kraken vs Gemini
- Coinbase vs Robinhood
- Coinbase vs Binance.US
FAQ
Is Binance or OKX better?
On VaultRubric's equal-weight rubric, OKX scores higher (48.3% vs 58.0% for Binance and OKX respectively). The better choice depends on what you weight most; run the tool with your own priorities.
Which has lower fees, Binance or OKX?
Entry-tier taker fees in our data: Binance 0.1%, OKX 0.1%. They are the same on that measure. Spreads and withdrawal fees are extra; check each fee page.
Has Binance been hacked?
Yes, our data records: 2019-05: 7,000 BTC (~$40M) hot-wallet breach; covered.
Is Binance available in the US?
No. Global exchange does not serve US; US users use separate Binance.US
Is OKX available in the US?
No. Global OKX not available in the US (only OKX US entity)
How does VaultRubric score platforms?
Each criterion gets 0–10 from cited evidence (curated dated data, live independent reviews, and AI analysis that must quote its source verbatim). Weights are normalized to 100%; missing data is excluded and shown as coverage. Platforms with an unreimbursed customer-funds hack in the last 48 months are capped at 60% and can't be the pick. Criminal guilty pleas (−2) and major civil settlements (−1) in the last 5 years reduce the security score.