VaultRubric
Bitget vs Bybit
Pick your crypto platform by the evidence.
Bitget and Bybit are both popular crypto exchanges. Below: the sourced facts side by side, then VaultRubric's equal-weight score with the math shown, so you can see exactly why one comes out ahead. Every number links to its source and date; anything we couldn't verify says not found.
Run your own comparison →Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
Key facts compared
| Fact | Bitget | Bybit |
|---|---|---|
| Trading fees (entry tier) | 0.1% maker / 0.1% taker Spot base; 0.08% paying in BGB src · 2026-10-10 | 0.1% maker / 0.1% taker Spot crypto pairs VIP 0; fiat-crypto 0.15/0.20 src · 2026-10-10 |
| Supported coins | 300+ src · 2026-10-10 | 280+ src · 2026-10-10 |
| Security incidents | 2026-09 ~$388M stolen from hot/warm wallets via zero-day in third-party security appliances; User Protection Fund to cover all losses, user balances unaffected src · 2026-10-10 src · 2026-10-10 | 2025-02 ~$1.4B ETH/stETH stolen from cold wallet via compromised Safe{Wallet} UI (Lazarus); covered from reserves src · 2026-10-10 src · 2026-10-10 |
| Regulatory / legal actions | none in curated data | none in curated data |
| Proof of reserves | not found | Yes src · 2026-10-10 |
| US availability | No US (and territories) listed as Prohibited Countries src · 2026-10-10 | No src · 2026-10-10 |
| Licensing / regulation | not found | not found |
VaultRubric verdict
VaultRubric pick: Bitget
⚠ Bitget: Hacked 2026-09, customers reimbursed
⚠ Bybit: Hacked 2025-02, customers reimbursed
| Criterion (weight) | Bitget | Bybit |
|---|---|---|
| Fees (17%) | 10.0/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Security & track record (17%) | 4.0/10 | 5.0/10 |
| Supported coins (17%) | 10.0/10 | 9.9/10 |
| Ease of use (17%) | 8.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Customer support (17%) | 3.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| US availability/regulation (17%) | 0.0/10 | 0.0/10 |
| Overall | 58.3% coverage 100% | 54.8% coverage 100% |
Show math: Bitget
0.167×10.0 + 0.167×4.0 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×0.0 = 5.83; ÷ covered weight 1.000 = 5.83/10 → 58.3%Show math: Bybit
0.167×10.0 + 0.167×5.0 + 0.167×9.9 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×2.0 + 0.167×0.0 = 5.48; ÷ covered weight 1.000 = 5.48/10 → 54.8%Pros and cons
From independent reviews; each point links to its source.
Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
Related comparisons
- Binance vs Bybit
- OKX vs Bybit
- Coinbase vs Kraken
- Coinbase vs Gemini
- Kraken vs Gemini
- Coinbase vs Robinhood
- Coinbase vs Binance.US
- Kraken vs Binance.US
FAQ
Is Bitget or Bybit better?
On VaultRubric's equal-weight rubric, Bitget scores higher (58.3% vs 54.8% for Bitget and Bybit respectively). The better choice depends on what you weight most; run the tool with your own priorities.
Which has lower fees, Bitget or Bybit?
Entry-tier taker fees in our data: Bitget 0.1%, Bybit 0.1%. They are the same on that measure. Spreads and withdrawal fees are extra; check each fee page.
Has Bitget been hacked?
Yes, our data records: 2026-09: ~$388M stolen from hot/warm wallets via zero-day in third-party security appliances; User Protection Fund to cover all losses, user balances unaffected.
Is Bitget available in the US?
No. US (and territories) listed as Prohibited Countries
Has Bybit been hacked?
Yes, our data records: 2025-02: ~$1.4B ETH/stETH stolen from cold wallet via compromised Safe{Wallet} UI (Lazarus); covered from reserves.
Is Bybit available in the US?
No.
How does VaultRubric score platforms?
Each criterion gets 0–10 from cited evidence (curated dated data, live independent reviews, and AI analysis that must quote its source verbatim). Weights are normalized to 100%; missing data is excluded and shown as coverage. Platforms with an unreimbursed customer-funds hack in the last 48 months are capped at 60% and can't be the pick. Criminal guilty pleas (−2) and major civil settlements (−1) in the last 5 years reduce the security score.