VaultRubric
Crypto.com vs Coinbase
Pick your crypto platform by the evidence.
Crypto.com and Coinbase are both popular crypto exchanges. Below: the sourced facts side by side, then VaultRubric's equal-weight score with the math shown, so you can see exactly why one comes out ahead. Every number links to its source and date; anything we couldn't verify says not found.
Run your own comparison →Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
Key facts compared
| Fact | Crypto.com | Coinbase |
|---|---|---|
| Trading fees (entry tier) | 0.25% maker / 0.5% taker Exchange base tier; app buys ~0.8% fee + ~1% spread (Yahoo). src · 2026-10-10 src · 2026-10-10 | 0.4%–0.6% maker / 0.6%–1.2% taker Coinbase Advanced base tier; sources disagree (0.40/0.60 vs 0.60/1.20). Simple buys: ~0.84% fee + ~1% spread per Yahoo. src · 2026-10-10 src · 2026-10-10 |
| Supported coins | 442+ src · 2026-10-10 | 271+ src · 2026-10-10 |
| Security incidents | none in curated data (not proof of none) | 2025-05 Bribed overseas support contractors leaked customer data (~69k accounts); no passwords/keys/funds accessed; est. cost up to $400M src src |
| Regulatory / legal actions | none in curated data | 2023-01 NYDFS consent order over compliance (AML/KYC) failures: $50M penalty + $50M compliance investment src · 2026-10-10 |
| Proof of reserves | not found | not found |
| US availability | Yes Crypto.com Exchange (U.S.) with ACH funding src · 2026-10-10 | Yes, 50 states src · 2026-10-10 |
| Licensing / regulation | CFTC-registered derivatives arm (per Datawallet) src · 2026-10-10 | Public company (Nasdaq-listed per Datawallet: 'S&P 500 listed'); NY BitLicense src · 2026-10-10 |
VaultRubric verdict
VaultRubric pick: Crypto.com
⚠ Coinbase: data breach (2025-05)
⚠ Coinbase: Regulatory: NYDFS consent order over compliance (AML/KYC) failures: $50M penalty + $50M compliance investment (2023-01)
| Criterion (weight) | Crypto.com | Coinbase |
|---|---|---|
| Fees (17%) | 10.0/10 | 4.6/10 |
| Security & track record (17%) | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Supported coins (17%) | 10.0/10 | 9.2/10 |
| Ease of use (17%) | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Customer support (17%) | 3.0/10 | 3.0/10 |
| US availability/regulation (17%) | 7.0/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Overall | 76.7% coverage 100% | 68.8% coverage 100% |
Show math: Crypto.com
0.167×10.0 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 7.67; ÷ covered weight 1.000 = 7.67/10 → 76.7%Show math: Coinbase
0.167×4.6 + 0.167×6.5 + 0.167×9.2 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×10.0 = 6.88; ÷ covered weight 1.000 = 6.88/10 → 68.8%Pros and cons
From independent reviews; each point links to its source.
Crypto.com
Pros
- Large selection of cryptocurrencies src
- Low trading fees with volume and CRO discounts src
- Strong security features src
- Best crypto IRA according to review src
Cons
Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
Related comparisons
- Coinbase vs Kraken
- Coinbase vs Gemini
- Coinbase vs Robinhood
- Coinbase vs Binance.US
- Best crypto exchange for beginners (US)
- Kraken vs Gemini
- Kraken vs Binance.US
- Binance vs OKX
FAQ
Is Crypto.com or Coinbase better?
On VaultRubric's equal-weight rubric, Crypto.com scores higher (76.7% vs 68.8% for Crypto.com and Coinbase respectively). The better choice depends on what you weight most; run the tool with your own priorities.
Which has lower fees, Crypto.com or Coinbase?
Entry-tier taker fees in our data: Crypto.com 0.5%, Coinbase 1.2%. Crypto.com is cheaper on that measure. Spreads and withdrawal fees are extra; check each fee page.
Is Crypto.com available in the US?
Yes. Crypto.com Exchange (U.S.) with ACH funding
Has Coinbase lost customer funds in a hack?
No customer-funds hack is in our curated data. It does list: 2025-05: Bribed overseas support contractors leaked customer data (~69k accounts); no passwords/keys/funds accessed; est. cost up to $400M.
Is Coinbase available in the US?
Yes. All 50 states
How does VaultRubric score platforms?
Each criterion gets 0–10 from cited evidence (curated dated data, live independent reviews, and AI analysis that must quote its source verbatim). Weights are normalized to 100%; missing data is excluded and shown as coverage. Platforms with an unreimbursed customer-funds hack in the last 48 months are capped at 60% and can't be the pick. Criminal guilty pleas (−2) and major civil settlements (−1) in the last 5 years reduce the security score.