MetaMask and Trust Wallet are both popular software wallets. Below: the sourced facts side by side, then VaultRubric's equal-weight score with the math shown, so you can see exactly why one comes out ahead. Every number links to its source and date; anything we couldn't verify says not found.
Run your own comparison →Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
| Fact | MetaMask | Trust Wallet |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | not found | not found |
| Supported coins | not found | 40+ 40+ networks src · 2026-10-10 |
| Security incidents | none in curated data (not proof of none) | 2025-12 Malicious browser-extension v2.68 published via leaked Chrome Web Store key; ~$8.5M drained from 2,520 addresses src src |
| Open source | not found | not found |
VaultRubric pick: MetaMask
⛔ Trust Wallet: customer funds hacked 2025-12 and not shown as fully reimbursed. Score capped at 60%, not eligible to be the pick.
| Criterion (weight) | MetaMask | Trust Wallet |
|---|---|---|
| Price (17%) | 10/10 | not found |
| Security (17%) | not found | 2.5/10 |
| Supported coins (17%) | not found | 10.0/10 |
| Ease of use (17%) | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Support (17%) | 3.0/10 | 2.0/10 |
| Backup/recovery (17%) | 7.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Overall | 70.0% coverage 67% | 55.0% coverage 83% |
0.167×10 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 4.67; ÷ covered weight 0.667 = 7.00/10 → 70.0%0.167×2.5 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×7.0 + 0.167×2.0 + 0.167×6.0 = 4.58; ÷ covered weight 0.833 = 5.50/10 → 55.0%From independent reviews; each point links to its source.
Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
On VaultRubric's equal-weight rubric, MetaMask scores higher (70.0% vs 55.0% for MetaMask and Trust Wallet respectively). The better choice depends on what you weight most; run the tool with your own priorities.
Yes, our data records: 2025-12: Malicious browser-extension v2.68 published via leaked Chrome Web Store key; ~$8.5M drained from 2,520 addresses.
Each criterion gets 0–10 from cited evidence (curated dated data, live independent reviews, and AI analysis that must quote its source verbatim). Weights are normalized to 100%; missing data is excluded and shown as coverage. Platforms with an unreimbursed customer-funds hack in the last 48 months are capped at 60% and can't be the pick. Criminal guilty pleas (−2) and major civil settlements (−1) in the last 5 years reduce the security score.