Ledger Nano S Plus and Trezor Safe 3 are both popular hardware wallets. Below: the sourced facts side by side, then VaultRubric's equal-weight score with the math shown, so you can see exactly why one comes out ahead. Every number links to its source and date; anything we couldn't verify says not found.
Run your own comparison →Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
| Fact | Ledger Nano S Plus | Trezor Safe 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | not found | not found |
| Supported coins | 15,000+ 15,000+ coins/tokens (vendor count) src · 2026-10-10 | 1,000+ 1,000+ (vendor count) src · 2026-10-10 |
| Security incidents | 2020-07 E-commerce DB breach: ~1M emails, ~272k detailed customer records leaked; devices/funds unaffected src | 2024-01 Third-party support portal breach: names/emails of up to 66k support contacts; no seeds/funds src |
| Open source | not found | not found |
Too close to call: Trezor Safe 3 and Ledger Nano S Plus are within 0.3 points (under 3). Pick on the criteria you care about most.
⚠ Trezor Safe 3: data breach (2024-01)
⚠ Ledger Nano S Plus: data breach (2020-07)
| Criterion (weight) | Trezor Safe 3 | Ledger Nano S Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Price (17%) | 10.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Security (17%) | 8.5/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Supported coins (17%) | 7.2/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Ease of use (17%) | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 |
| Support (17%) | 4.0/10 | 7.0/10 |
| Backup/recovery (17%) | 9.0/10 | 6.0/10 |
| Overall | 77.8% coverage 100% | 77.5% coverage 100% |
0.167×10.0 + 0.167×8.5 + 0.167×7.2 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×4.0 + 0.167×9.0 = 7.78; ÷ covered weight 1.000 = 7.78/10 → 77.8%0.167×7.5 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×7.0 + 0.167×6.0 = 7.75; ÷ covered weight 1.000 = 7.75/10 → 77.5%From independent reviews; each point links to its source.
Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
It's too close to call on VaultRubric's equal-weight rubric (77.5% vs 77.8%, under 3 points apart). The better choice depends on what you weight most; run the tool with your own priorities.
No customer-funds hack is in our curated data. It does list: 2020-07: E-commerce DB breach: ~1M emails, ~272k detailed customer records leaked; devices/funds unaffected.
No customer-funds hack is in our curated data. It does list: 2024-01: Third-party support portal breach: names/emails of up to 66k support contacts; no seeds/funds.
Each criterion gets 0–10 from cited evidence (curated dated data, live independent reviews, and AI analysis that must quote its source verbatim). Weights are normalized to 100%; missing data is excluded and shown as coverage. Platforms with an unreimbursed customer-funds hack in the last 48 months are capped at 60% and can't be the pick. Criminal guilty pleas (−2) and major civil settlements (−1) in the last 5 years reduce the security score.