Too close to call. Zengo (78.0%) and Edge (76.7%) are within 1.3 points, under our 3-point threshold, so we don't name a winner.
Data as of · Last updated · By VaultRubric Research · How we score · Not investment advice.
Every software wallet in our curated dataset, scored with equal weights on price, security record, coin support, ease of use, support and backup/recovery. Wallets under 75% data coverage stay listed with a limited-data badge and can't be the pick. Software wallets are convenient but keep keys on an internet-connected device; for larger amounts consider a hardware wallet.
Run your own comparison →Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
| Fact | MetaMask | Exodus | Trust Wallet | Coinbase Wallet | Phantom | Rabby | Zengo | Electrum | BlueWallet | Sparrow | Rainbow | Atomic Wallet | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found |
| Supported coins | 19+ Lower bound: 19 networks pre-listed in MetaMask's network selector (Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, Tron, Linea, Base, Polygon, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, OP, Avalanche, zkSync Era and more) plus any custom EVM network; total token count not published src · 2026-10-11 | not found | 40+ 40+ networks src · 2026-10-10 | not found | 5+ Lower bound: chains named on phantom.com (Solana, Ethereum, Bitcoin, Robinhood, HyperEVM 'and more'); total token count not published src · 2026-10-11 | not found | 1,000+ src · 2026-10-10 | 1+ Bitcoin only src · 2026-10-10 | 1+ Bitcoin + Lightning src · 2026-10-10 | 1+ Bitcoin only src · 2026-10-10 | not found | 500+ 500+ assets src · 2026-10-10 | not found |
| Security incidents | none in curated data (not proof of none) | none in curated data (not proof of none) | 2025-12 Malicious browser-extension v2.68 published via leaked Chrome Web Store key; ~$8.5M drained from 2,520 addresses src src 2023-04 CVE-2023-31290: Trust Wallet browser extension generated keys with only 32 bits of entropy; exploited Dec 2022 and Mar 2023 (~$170K); Trust Wallet reimbursed affected users src · 2026-10-11 src · 2026-10-11 2023-07 CVE-2024-23660: Trust Wallet iOS used time-seeded randomness for wallet generation; exploited 2023-07-12; Trust Wallet says affected users were notified and migrated; researchers report multiple victims; reimbursement not documented src · 2026-10-11 src · 2026-10-11 | 2023-03 Zengo 'red pill' research: transaction-simulation bypass affected Coinbase Wallet among others; fixed; no user funds reported stolen src · 2026-10-11 src · 2026-10-11 | none in curated data (not proof of none) | none in curated data (not proof of none) | 2023-08 BitForge (CVE-2023-33242) MPC implementation flaws disclosed by Fireblocks affected Zengo; fixed before disclosure; no exploitation reported src · 2026-10-11 src · 2026-10-11 | 2023-09 Electrum security advisories: Lightning payment_preimage validation skipped on Android and partial MPP acceptance; fixed in 4.4.x src · 2026-10-11 src · 2026-10-11 2026-04 Electrum security advisories: external-plugin authorization bypass (local code execution) and Nostr Wallet Connect spending-limit bypass; fixed in 4.7.2 src · 2026-10-11 src · 2026-10-11 | none in curated data (not proof of none) | none in curated data (not proof of none) | none in curated data (not proof of none) | 2023-06 Over $100M stolen from 5,500+ user wallets; attributed to North Korea's Lazarus Group src | none in curated data (not proof of none) |
| Open source | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found | not found | partial src · 2026-10-10 | not found | not found | not found | True src · 2026-10-10 | not found | True src · 2026-10-10 |
Weights: Price 17%, Security 17%, Supported coins 17%, Ease of use 17%, Support 17%, Backup/recovery 17%
Too close to call: Zengo and Edge are within 1.3 points (under 3). Pick on the criteria you care about most.
⚠ Zengo: software vulnerability (2023-08)
⚠ Coinbase Wallet: software vulnerability (2023-03)
⛔ Atomic Wallet: customer funds hacked 2023-06 and not shown as fully reimbursed. Score capped at 60%, not eligible to be the pick.
⚠ Electrum: software vulnerability (2023-09)
⚠ Electrum: software vulnerability (2026-04)
⛔ Trust Wallet: customer funds hacked 2025-12 and not shown as fully reimbursed. Score capped at 60%, not eligible to be the pick.
⚠ Trust Wallet: Hacked 2023-04, customers reimbursed
| Criterion (weight) | Zengo | Edge | Exodus | Rabby | MetaMask | Coinbase Wallet | Atomic Wallet | BlueWallet | Rainbow | Electrum | Sparrow | Phantom | Trust Wallet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (17%) | 10/10 | 10/10 | 10/10 | 10/10 | 10/10 | 10/10 | not found | 10/10 | 10/10 | 10/10 | not found | 10/10 | not found |
| Security (17%) | 5.8/10 | 6.5/10 | 5.5/10 | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 | 5.8/10 | 2.5/10 | 6.5/10 | 6.5/10 | 5.8/10 | 6.5/10 | 6.0/10 | 0/10 |
| Supported coins (17%) | 10.0/10 | not found | not found | not found | 4.3/10 | not found | 9.0/10 | 1.0/10 | not found | 1.0/10 | 1.0/10 | 2.6/10 | 5.4/10 |
| Ease of use (17%) | 8.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 9.0/10 | 9.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 9.0/10 | 8.9/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | 6.0/10 | not found | 6.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 7.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive |
| Support (17%) | 7.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 9.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 4.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 3.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 3.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 3.0/10 | 6.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 3.0/10 | 4.0/10 | 3.0/10 | 7.5/10 | 3.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 2.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive |
| Backup/recovery (17%) | 6.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 9.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 3.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 7.0/10 | 4.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 6.0/10 |
| Overall | 78.0% coverage 100% | 76.7% coverage 83% | 65.0% coverage 83% | 65.0% coverage 83% | 63.8% coverage 100% | 63.8% coverage 83% | 60.0% coverage 83% | 59.2% coverage 100% | 58.3% coverage 83% | 54.7% coverage 100% | 53.3% coverage 67% limited data | 52.7% coverage 100% | 42.3% coverage 83% |
0.167×10 + 0.167×5.8 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×7.0 + 0.167×6.0 = 7.80 → 78.0%0.167×10 + 0.167×6.5 + 0.167×3.5* + 0.167×9.0 + 0.167×9.0 + 0.167×8.0 = 7.67 → 76.7% (* unknown, imputed)0.167×10 + 0.167×5.5 + 0.167×3.5* + 0.167×9.0 + 0.167×4.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 6.50 → 65.0% (* unknown, imputed)0.167×10 + 0.167×6.5 + 0.167×3.5* + 0.167×7.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×9.0 = 6.50 → 65.0% (* unknown, imputed)0.167×10 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×4.3 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 6.38 → 63.8%0.167×10 + 0.167×5.8 + 0.167×3.5* + 0.167×9.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 6.38 → 63.8% (* unknown, imputed)0.167×5.0* + 0.167×2.5 + 0.167×9.0 + 0.167×8.9 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 6.40 → 64.0% (* unknown, imputed); capped at 60% (customer funds hacked 2023-06)0.167×10 + 0.167×6.5 + 0.167×1.0 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 5.92 → 59.2%0.167×10 + 0.167×6.5 + 0.167×3.5* + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×4.0 + 0.167×3.0 = 5.83 → 58.3% (* unknown, imputed)0.167×10 + 0.167×5.8 + 0.167×1.0 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×7.0 = 5.47 → 54.7%0.167×5.0* + 0.167×6.5 + 0.167×1.0 + 0.167×5.0* + 0.167×7.5 + 0.167×7.0 = 5.33 → 53.3% (* unknown, imputed)0.167×10 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×2.6 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×3.0 + 0.167×4.0 = 5.27 → 52.7%0.167×5.0* + 0.167×0 + 0.167×5.4 + 0.167×7.0 + 0.167×2.0 + 0.167×6.0 = 4.23 → 42.3% (* unknown, imputed)Too close to call between Zengo and Edge (within 3 points). Your answer depends on your priorities; adjust the weights in the tool.
Each criterion gets 0–10 from cited evidence (curated dated data, live independent reviews, and AI analysis that must quote its source verbatim). Weights are normalized to 100%; missing data is scored at a conservative placeholder (5/10, or the comparison median if lower) so it can't lift a rank, and real-evidence share is shown as coverage. Under 75% coverage can't be the pick; within 3 points is Too close to call. Platforms with an unreimbursed customer-funds hack in the last 48 months are capped at 60% and can't be the pick. Fund-loss hacks deduct 3 security points; incidents where no customer funds were lost (data/email leaks, company-treasury losses) deduct only 0.5, half after 24 months and zero after 48. Criminal guilty pleas (−2) and major civil settlements (−1) in the last 5 years reduce the security score.