Trezor is VaultRubric's pick: it scores 90.8% vs Tangem's 80.8% (a 10.0-point lead).
Data as of · Last updated · By VaultRubric Research · How we score · Not investment advice.
Trezor and Tangem are both popular hardware wallets. Below: the sourced facts side by side, then VaultRubric's equal-weight score with the math shown, so you can see exactly why one comes out ahead. Every number links to its source and date; anything we couldn't verify says not found.
Run your own comparison →Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
| Fact | Trezor | Tangem |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | not found | not found |
| Supported coins | 1,000+ 1,000+ (vendor count) src · 2026-10-10 | 90+ 90+ blockchains (chains, not coins) src · 2026-10-10 |
| Security incidents | 2024-01 Third-party support portal breach: names/emails of up to 66k support contacts; no seeds/funds src 2025-09 Trezor advisory / CVE-2025-69893: BIP-39 mnemonic processing side channel (physical access); affects Model One and Model T/Safe 3/Safe 5 on universal firmware with BIP-39 backup; fixed in firmware; no funds loss reported src · 2026-10-11 src · 2026-10-11 | 2026-07 Ledger Donjon laser fault-injection attack resets a Tangem card's access code (physical access + ~$250K lab equipment); cards can't be patched; Tangem disputes practicality; no real-world losses known src · 2026-10-11 src · 2026-10-11 |
| Open source | not found | not found |
VaultRubric pick: Trezor
⚠ Trezor: data breach (2024-01)
⚠ Trezor: firmware vulnerability (physical access only; informational, not scored) (2025-09)
⚠ Tangem: firmware vulnerability (physical access only; informational, not scored) (2026-07)
| Criterion (weight) | Trezor | Tangem |
|---|---|---|
| Price (17%) | 9.3/10 | 10.0/10 |
| Security (17%) | 9.2/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Supported coins (17%) | 10.0/10 | 6.5/10 |
| Ease of use (17%) | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive |
| Support (17%) | 9.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive | 6.0/10 customer reviews (Trustpilot), may skew positive |
| Backup/recovery (17%) | 9.0/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Overall | 90.8% coverage 100% | 80.8% coverage 100% |
0.167×9.3 + 0.167×9.2 + 0.167×10.0 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×9.0 + 0.167×9.0 = 9.09 → 90.8%0.167×10.0 + 0.167×9.0 + 0.167×6.5 + 0.167×8.0 + 0.167×6.0 + 0.167×9.0 = 8.08 → 80.8%From independent reviews; each point links to its source.
Opens the tool with these platforms filled in, so you can change the weights.
On VaultRubric's equal-weight rubric, Trezor scores higher (90.8% vs 80.8% for Trezor and Tangem respectively). The better choice depends on what you weight most; run the tool with your own priorities.
No customer-funds hack is in our curated data. It does list: 2024-01: Third-party support portal breach: names/emails of up to 66k support contacts; no seeds/funds; 2025-09: Trezor advisory / CVE-2025-69893: BIP-39 mnemonic processing side channel (physical access); affects Model One and Model T/Safe 3/Safe 5 on universal firmware with BIP-39 backup; fixed in firmware; no funds loss reported.
No customer-funds hack is in our curated data. It does list: 2026-07: Ledger Donjon laser fault-injection attack resets a Tangem card's access code (physical access + ~$250K lab equipment); cards can't be patched; Tangem disputes practicality; no real-world losses known.
Each criterion gets 0–10 from cited evidence (curated dated data, live independent reviews, and AI analysis that must quote its source verbatim). Weights are normalized to 100%; missing data is scored at a conservative placeholder (5/10, or the comparison median if lower) so it can't lift a rank, and real-evidence share is shown as coverage. Under 75% coverage can't be the pick; within 3 points is Too close to call. Platforms with an unreimbursed customer-funds hack in the last 48 months are capped at 60% and can't be the pick. Fund-loss hacks deduct 3 security points; incidents where no customer funds were lost (data/email leaks, company-treasury losses) deduct only 0.5, half after 24 months and zero after 48. Criminal guilty pleas (−2) and major civil settlements (−1) in the last 5 years reduce the security score.